Archive for the ‘Software’ Category

Check out the new CHARTrunner® Lean release!

December 5, 2011

CHARTrunner Lean's easy-to-use interface makes creating and viewing your charts simple.CHARTrunner Lean is the next generation of charting software from PQ Systems. The software generates process performance charts from a variety of data sources to help you optimize your processes and demonstrate proof of quality performance.

Charting your data has never been easier! We’ve taken an innovative approach to charting by creating a brand new user interface. This provides a simplified user-experience that further streamlines the process of creating charts that can be interpreted and shared with others.

Data can be complex, and CHARTrunner Lean allows you to more quickly interpret what your data means and make data-driven business decisions. To learn more, watch an overview video or attend a free demo.

GAGEpack printer issue

March 1, 2011

David Shattuck

Shortly after GAGEpack 9.0 was released last fall, we began to get calls from users who were having trouble printing labels after upgrading to the new version. Naturally, our GAGEpack development team grew concerned, and launched an investigation to track down the problem and resolve it. Our findings surprised us.

After talking with users who were experiencing these problems and doing a hefty bit of testing internally, we were eventually able to isolate the trouble to those systems that were using all three of these components: GAGEpack 9.0, Windows XP, and Brother printers. Any user running a different version of GAGEpack, a different version of Windows, or a different type of printer would have no label problems at all.

This was an extremely peculiar conclusion, because we knew that each of those three components will work correctly on its own or combined with just one of the others. If GAGEpack 9.0 works fine with Windows XP and it works fine with a Brother printer, why do we see problems when GAGEpack 9.0 tries to work with both Windows XP and a Brother printer at the same time? It was quite a mystery.  Our tech sleuths were all over it.

As it turns out, the trouble lies with the drivers that Brother has published to enable their printers to communicate with Windows XP. These drivers were last updated in March 2002. In software terms, they are ancient. This was not a problem in GAGEpack 8.5 because every version of GAGEpack released since the early 1990s had been written in Microsoft’s VB6 programming language. However, VB6 has been officially unsupported as a software development language since March 2008. GAGEpack 9.0 is written in the new VB.net, which was extremely young and not commonly used the last time the Brother Windows XP printer drivers were updated.

Windows XP is going to be around until at least April 2014, and we hope that Brother will update its antiquated drivers before then. In the meantime, if you are a GAGEpack 9.0 user struggling with this problem, we offer two solutions. The first option is to upgrade your operating system to a newer version of Windows. Windows Vista and Windows 7 both work great with the label printing. If you decide to go that route, I recommend Windows 7, for reasons far too numerous to discuss here. The second option is to replace your label printer. During our testing on this issue, we purchased a Dymo printer to replace the Brother p-touch that we’ve been using for many years. The new Dymo hasn’t given us any trouble.

Based on these findings, we’re recommending non-Brother printers to our customers who may be in the market for replacement printers.

Share your charting story, create a charting innovation

October 20, 2010

Steve Daum

You are looking at a chart. You are going through an analysis and interpretation process. What data is being represented? How important is the data? Does the chart signal any changes? Does the chart show anything that is “bad” or “good?”  Does the chart offer proof of quality?

Ultimately, you want to answer the question: is any action required based on what I see?

Now, think about the workflow leading up to this. How did the chart get created?  How was the data gathered? What part of the process was difficult or error prone? Would it have been possible for you to miss this chart among your other tasks?

At PQ we’ve been pondering questions like these for  more than twenty years. We are working hard on our products and services to reduce friction in your quality improvement processes. If you have a charting story to tell, please share it with us; who knows, it may lead to the next great quality improvement solution.

GAGEmail: The secret treat included with GAGEpack

October 13, 2010

David Shattuck

When I do a product demonstration of GAGEpack and I arrive at the segment where I talk about GAGEmail, I often find myself introducing it by saying, “I wish more people knew about this.” In fact, it is not uncommon for me to come across veteran GAGEpack users who are unaware that they have a program like GAGEmail at their disposal.

GAGEmail is a tiny program designed to run in the background and continuously scan GAGEpack databases to watch for upcoming gage servicing events. When it finds an event, it will e-mail a reminder to the person responsible for that gage. This proactive approach to calibration reminders makes GAGEmail unique among GAGEpack‘s notification methods. Normally, users must remember to remind themselves of upcoming events by checking their reports or filtered gage lists. With GAGEmail, the reminder is entirely automated.

In addition to being automated, these reminders are also quite flexible. The user can specify which types of events trigger e-mails, how far in advance of the event they should be sent, who should receive them, and what they should say.

The reason I wish more people knew about GAGEmail is because it does not cost anything extra to use; GAGEmail is included with every license of GAGEpack purchased since version 8.5. In order to use it, customers simply need to install it using their GAGEpack disk or download it directly from the GAGEpack page on our website.

As always, I am available to offer assistance with setting up GAGEmail. You can call me at 800-777-5060, e-mail me at support@pqsystems.com, or leave questions for me below.

Help us welcome the new addition to the GAGEpack family

September 22, 2010

Mike Cleary

We celebrated the release of GAGEpack 9.0, the newest member of the PQ software family, this week. As the youngest child, it comes from good stock—GAGEpack has been known and loved by customers since the release of the first version more than 20 years ago.

Infant that it is, it has more grown-up features than you can shake a stick at, and will serve a highly mature audience of calibration professionals with new ways of assuring accuracy in records and proof of efficiency. But I still feel like a new, proud father as I look at the screen shots with their clarity and ease of use.

I hope you’ll have a chance to hold the baby…and take it for a free ride!

Learn more about GAGEpack 9.0.

Concurrent-user licensing or not concurrent-user licensing? That is the question!

August 17, 2010

David Shattuck

Last year we deployed a new licensing option for all three of our major software applications. Up until that point, our customers licensed the software on a “per-computer” basis, meaning every computer terminal being used to run the program required its own unique license. As the software industry shifted towards enterprise and network licensing options, we received a steady stream of requests for more flexible “roaming” licenses. Thus, the concurrent-user license was born.

A concurrent-user license allows an organization to install our software on an unlimited number of computers on the same network, giving them the freedom to put these applications into the hands of any/all of their employees without the cost and hassle of managing individual licenses. The only restriction in the concurrent model is the number of people who can access the program simultaneously; when the sixth person attempts to log into a five-user license, they will get a message saying that the server is full.

We still offer the per-computer licenses, but the concurrent-user licenses have been steadily growing in popularity since they were launched.  Consequently, I routinely find myself answering the question “Should I switch to a concurrent-user license?”  My response is always the same:  “It depends.”

The value of a concurrent-user license versus the traditional per-computer license depends heavily on what sort of traffic to the program is anticipated. If you expect infrequent and fairly brief access from many computer terminals, a concurrent-user license would meet your needs for a fraction of what it would cost to license all of those terminals individually. On the other hand, if you have only a few terminals that need near-constant access to the program, it would likely be more cost effective to invest in per-computer licenses. In both scenarios, both licensing options could be applied to grant the required access, but selecting the appropriate license would save a pretty penny.

Please feel free to contact your account representative if you have questions about your specific application or contact me via e-mail at davids@pqsystems.com. We would be happy to discuss different licensing options with you.

Like control charts? Wait ‘til you see this video…

April 15, 2010

If you’ve forgotten what control charts are and why they’re important, this three-minute video will remind you how this critical tool can help you demonstrate proof of quality performance, whether you produce a service or a product.

In a heartbeat, you’ll understand the difference between special cause variation and common cause variation—and you’ll learn what to do about it and how data speaks to you about managing your processes.

You may want to show this short, just-released, snappy video to your boss:

http://www.youtube.com/pqsystems

The difference between run charts and control charts

December 3, 2009

Steve Daum

A customer recently asked one of our support representatives the following questions: What is the difference between a run chart and a control chart? And when should I use one vs. the other? These are great questions because they allow us to highlight some of the benefits of control charts.

When you create any chart, you are typically trying to answer a question. For example, you might be asking, “Has my process improved?” or, “Has my process gotten worse?”  You might be asking, “How is the process running today compared to yesterday?” Before you decide on using a run chart or a control chart, consider the type of question you want to answer.

(more…)

An improved improvement chart

October 22, 2009

Matt Savage

If you have worked with count charts with large denominators, you have probably seen control limits that seem too narrow to be of much value. The p-chart is one of the attributes charts with this flaw.

A p-chart counts two things: 1) the number of non-conforming items (the numerator) and 2) the number of items inspected (the denominator). If you look at the glass half-full rather than half-empty, you might count the number of conforming items (rather than non-conforming). In either case, when the denominator is large, a problem may be present.

Consider the following chart which shows a p-chart from a plastic shopping bag manufacturer.

This chart measures the percent of plastic bags that failed a particular test. The bag manufacturer averages about 20,000 bags inspected in each sample and about 600 failures. As you can tell by looking at this chart, the limits seem too tight to be useful. The control limits are considered to be overly-dispersed.

(more…)

The PQ Systems Knowledgebase

October 6, 2009

Steve Daum

Did you know that PQ Systems maintains a robust knowledge base online? It is a repository of common problems and solutions related to using our software and practicing continuous quality improvement. If you are an SQCpack, CHARTrunner, or GAGEpack user, you might just find a solution to your problem here:

http://www.pqsystems.com/kb/activekb/

In a recently-added article, Craig Newland, addresses how to count or group data that has been accumulated during certain periods of time. If you use CHARTrunner, visit: http://www.pqsystems.com/kb/activekb/questions/543/CR%3A+Data+grouping+tardiness to learn how to group your data to make your control chart analysis more telling.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.